November 17th, 2014
A man known as the “20th hijacker” who is serving a life sentence for his admitted role in conspiring to murder Americans in the Sept. 11 attacks in 2001 has come forward with some shocking new allegations, claiming that a Saudi Arabian royal helped fund the devastating terror events.
Zacarias Moussaoui, 46, has said, more specifically, that a Saudi prince paid to train him and the 19 hijackers in the time leading up to the attacks.
He issued these allegations in recently filed federal court documents, alleging that the prince was fully aware that the training was being done on behalf ofOsama bin Laden, according to the Daily Mail.
“I am ready to testify about all the above and more in your court in an Open Hearing that I request,”Moussaoui said in a handwritten court document dated October 23.
According to his account, Prince Turki Al Faisal AlSaud met with him, provided him with funding and also financially assisted the other 19 Sept. 11 terrorists.
Moussaoui also detailed an alleged Al Qaeda plan to shoot down Air Force One when Bill Clinton was in office — a purported plot that he said involved an employee at one of Saudi Arabia’s embassies, according to the Oklahoman.
The Saudi government has denied any involvement in the 9/11 attacks in the past and some say that Moussaoui‘s own credibility is at issue in taking his claims at face value, especially considering that a defense psychologist once said he suffers from delusions as a result of paranoid schizophrenia.
Still, this isn’t the first time Saudi Arabia has been accused of involvement in the Sept. 11 attacks....
November 17th, 2014
A burglar in Seattle got way more than he bargained for when he tried to break into the home of an 82nd Airborne veteran for a second time.
The paratrooper, Andrew Myers, explained that the "local creeper" had already broke into his basement in the middle of the night on Veterans Day, but didn't take anything except a shirt.
So he and his girlfriend decided to set up a camera outside, anticipating that the man would come back. He returned Saturday night and this time he encountered Myers.
Myers said the suspect first tried to claim he lived there, and after being told the police had been called, he threw a punch and tried to get away.
A very one-sided tussle ensued, with Myers holding the man down until cops arrived and made the arrest.
Almost the entire thing was captured on the veteran's surveillance camera.
He posted it to YouTube and set it to music. Well done!
MORE FROM FOX NEWS INSIDER
November 17th, 2014
By Barry Secrest
Is anyone truly surprised that those of us making up the Tea Party who've been called racists, bigots, uneducated hicks, zealots, and other names too numerous to mention, have now ultimately been proven right?
Obamacare, as the epic malediction of ghastly proportion which will warp & twist the US medical system into a thing soon to become unrecognizable, has now been proven to be a hoax --predicated upon a willing mainstream media and its useful and quote-unquote "stupid" apparatchiks.
All of this after the belated discovery of the truth, which many of us already knew, from none other than one of Obamacare's original architects, Dr. Jon Gruber.
So, who is this Jonathan Gruber? He's an ill-illustrious egg-head from MIT, and quite a weaseley one at that, and he's certainly not a spin Doctor, based upon the raging s**t-storm unfolding around him.
According to Wiki, "He is a key architect of both the 2006 Massachusetts health care reform, sometimes referred to as "Romneycare", and the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, sometimes referred to as "Obamacare".
Romneycare, by the way, collapsed about a year or so ago which led to hundreds of thousands losing coverage, amid much suppression and media quiet.
An excerpt from the website Moonbattery lays out the penultimate hoax that is Obamacare, about as succinctly as any other known remonstration:
"1. In order to insure the uninsured, we first have to uninsure the insured.
2. Next, we require the newly uninsured to be re-insured.
3. To re-insure the newly uninsured, they are required to pay more to be insured.
4. The extra charges are required so that the original insured, who became uninsured, and then became re-insured, can pay enough extra so that the original uninsured can be insured, which to them will be free of charge."
Obamacare has been proven to be nothing much more than a vast redistribution of both medical care and wealth, aimed parenthetically at eventually controlling the US populace in a way unmatched in American history.
But, now we know this for an admitted certainty--Obamacare is a grand hoax perpetrated on an epic scale, so, why are we still having the conversation on whether or not to repeal?
Isn't it elementary at this point?
"It takes a long time to do the necessary administrative steps that have to be taken to put the legislation together to control the people."
So, what has Dr. Gruber stated thus far which brings us to this point? Let us count the ways....
In the below clip, from 10/17/13, Gruber states the overall impetus of the Obamacare hoax and addresses the "stupidity of American voters."
Next up, from 10/4/13, Gruber explains the Cadillac tax and, once again, the"stupidity" of the American voter as causative......
November 16th, 2014
By Barry Secrest
We have customs agents being attacked by illegal aliens who are bringing in Billions in dangerous and illicit drugs and arms over the boarder, and US Federal agents are actually going after NFL team locker rooms, for drugs?
The increasingly banana Republic government of Obama, has already attacked the Washington Redskins via the US Patent office, because of a few whining Progressive fans who simply cannot live without finding some phantom offense which becomes ultimately meaningless.
Now, US tax dollars are being spent, in vain, going after one of America's favorite past times.
This extraordinary comedy of a regime, quite frankly, which has rather quickly trickled down into every facet of our government, has become its own caricature of incompetence and bad judgement.
Remember the Secret Service embroglios, the Obamacare fraud, and let's not forget the climate hoax and AP bugging? Now we have yet another meddlesome fraud of an effort from US officials.
The following news story comes to us from AP sportswriter Jim Litke, God help us get through these final two years:
Federal drug enforcement agents showed up unannounced Sunday to check at least three visiting NFL teams’ medical staffs as part of an investigation into former players’ claims that teams mishandled prescription drugs.
There were no arrests, Drug Enforcement Administration spokesman Rusty Payne said Sunday. The San Francisco 49ers’ staff was checked at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey, after they played the New York Giants. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers’ staff was checked at Baltimore-Washington International airport after playing the Redskins. The Seattle Seahawks, who played at Kansas City, confirmed via the team’s Twitter account that they were spot-checked as well.
The operation was still ongoing, and other teams may be checked later Sunday, Payne said.
‘‘DEA agents are currently interviewing NFL team doctors in several locations as part of an ongoing investigation into potential violations of the (Controlled Substances Act),’’ Payne said.
The spot checks were done by investigators from the federal DEA. They did not target specific teams, but were done to measure whether visiting NFL clubs were generally in compliance with federal law. Agents requested documentation from visiting teams’ medical staffs for any controlled substances in their possession, and for proof that doctors could practice medicine in the home team’s state.
‘‘Our teams cooperated with the DEA today and we have no information to indicate that irregularities were found,’’ NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said in an email.
The nationwide probe is being directed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York — where the NFL is headquartered — but involves several U.S. attorney’s offices.
November 16th, 2014
Much like Obamacare and numerous other unpopular measures put in place by the authoritarian Democrat Party (and backed by the media) the prospect of giving America away to millions of militant illegal aliens is not as popular as the Leftists claim.
"The fate of a little-noticed ballot measure in strongly Democratic Oregon serves as a warning to President Barack Obama and his party about the political perils of immigration policy".....~ Refocus Notes
By JONATHAN J. COOPER and NICHOLAS RICCARDI
PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — The fate of a little-noticed ballot measure in strongly Democratic Oregon serves as a warning to President Barack Obama and his party about the political perils of immigration policy.
Even as Oregon voters were legalizing recreational marijuana and expanding Democratic majorities in state government, they decided by a margin of 66-34 to cancel a new state law that would have provided driver's licenses to people who are in the United States illegally.
Obama is considering acting on his own, as early as this week, to possibly shield from deportation up to 5 million immigrants now living illegally in the country. Some Republicans in Congress are threatening a government shutdown if the president follows through.
"The Oregon measure tells you these measures are not easy or simple," said Muzaffar Chishti of the Migration Policy Institute. "The political cost may be significant, even in blue states."
The state law had seemed to be popular. It easily passed last year with bipartisan support in the Democratic-controlled Legislature and was signed Democratic Gov. John Kitzhaber, who was re-elected Nov. 4.
Opponents barely gathered enough signatures to put the repeal question on the ballot. Immigrant rights groups outspent their opponents 10-1.
Still, the measure failed in every county but the state's most liberal one, Multnomah, home to Portland. Even there it trailed significantly behind other Democratic candidates and causes.
"It was really the epitome of a grassroots effort," said Cynthia Kendoll, one of the activists who led the campaign against licenses. "There's such a disconnect between what people really want and what's happening."
Obama made his postelection pledge on immigration despite the drubbing that Democrats took across the country. He said he had to act because Congress has deadlocked on immigration for years.
Not a Bi-Partisan Movement Any Longer
A bipartisan Senate bill to provide citizenship to many of the 11 million people in the U.S. illegally died in the Republican-controlled House, and with the GOP now holding a majority in the Senate, many believe it is unlikely any broad immigration measure could make it to Obama before the end of his term.
Allowing immigrants in the U.S. illegally to remain in the country generally polls well. Even 57 percent of the conservative-leaning national electorate that voted Nov. 4 favors legalization, according to exit polling for the Associated Press and other news organizations.
Immigration has been seen as a winning issue for Democrats because Hispanic and Asian populations account for an increasing share of the electorate, especially in presidential years.
Eleven other states have granted driver's licenses to people in the U.S. illegally, and 17 allow them to pay in-state tuition at public universities.
But Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington, D.C., which advocates more restrictions on immigration, says voters often are befuddled by complex immigration proposals and polling questions, overstating the actual support for an immigration overhaul.
The Oregon vote, he said, is proof of that.
"Whenever the public gets that sort of clear-cut, black-and-white issue for tougher controls — even in Oregon, when they're legalizing dope — they support them," Krikorian said. "It really highlights how this issue is not a Republican-liberal issue like, say, taxes and abortion, but an up-down issue, elites versus the public."
Greg Olson, a lifelong Portland resident and conservative, was pleasantly surprised the driver's license law was repealed by such a large margin in his liberal state. "Licensing for driving I think is a privilege for a legal citizen," Olson said.
Oregon immigrant rights groups argue that the issue wasn't as clear as opponents are suggesting after the fact. The state has a relatively small immigrant community — only 12 percent of the population is Hispanic and 3 percent Asian, below the national average for both ethnic groups.
Because relatively little money was spent on the campaign, voters did not know why they should preserve the licenses, said Andrea Miller, director of the Oregon immigrant-rights group Causa.
"This was a very nuanced, very complex measure," Miller said. "Just because someone voted no doesn't mean they don't accept the immigrant community. It doesn't mean that they don't want immigration reform. It means they don't want that particular solution for Oregon."
Marshall Fitz of the Center for American Progress in Washington, which has argued that Obama should act, acknowledged that the first response of many voters may be unfavorable to immigrant rights groups' cause.
"Is there an instinct toward security, hunkering down and against welcoming the other?" Fitz said. "That's part of human nature. But that doesn't mean instincts can't be overcome by reason."