November 24th, 2014
By Barry Secrest and Kim Stallings
Upon the now dreaded by many announcement of the Grand Jury's verdict regarding Police officer Darren Wilson's legal fate, it has been learned that community organizing activists have established a website informing protesters of where to gather in many cities across the US.
The verdict will be announced at 9:00pm.
The event protests/ rallies will take place either immediately following the verdict announcement or the day after announcement, at various times dependent upon the location. Some of the locations actually indicate 'Police HQ' as the venue of the protest, while others indicate Federal Buildings, City Halls, and various monuments.
The website, which has quickly risen in the number of visits according to web traffic experts, is titled 'Ferguson National Response Network.' When navigating the site, visitors can click on a city to learn both the location and time for the gathering, along with notes, which are left by other members.
The notes left by visitors for each city are an assemblage of remarks and often racially motivated diatribes. In one note, a video gif image shows a young white girl being high-kicked to the ground by a black male, another depicts an animated college student hoping to be hit by an approaching car in order for her to avoid having to pay tuition.
The notes seem to run the gamut; however, the concensus of the remarks point to obvious forms of racially motivated civil disobedience. In a pictogram on the site, civil disobedience training is being offered along with various sign-making activities being planned.
No one can be certain how many will attend; however, officials in most larger cities are reported to be in a high state of readiness.
November 16th, 2014
By Barry Secrest
Is anyone truly surprised that those of us making up the Tea Party who've been called racists, bigots, uneducated hicks, zealots, and other names too numerous to mention, have now ultimately been proven right?
Obamacare, as the epic malediction of ghastly proportion which will warp & twist the US medical system into a thing soon to become unrecognizable, has now been proven to be a hoax --predicated upon a willing mainstream media and its useful and quote-unquote "stupid" apparatchiks.
All of this after the belated discovery of the truth, which many of us already knew, from none other than one of Obamacare's original architects, Dr. Jon Gruber.
So, who is this Jonathan Gruber? He's an ill-illustrious egg-head from MIT, and quite a weaseley one at that, and he's certainly not a spin Doctor, based upon the raging s**t-storm unfolding around him.
According to Wiki, "He is a key architect of both the 2006 Massachusetts health care reform, sometimes referred to as "Romneycare", and the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, sometimes referred to as "Obamacare".
Romneycare, by the way, collapsed about a year or so ago which led to hundreds of thousands losing coverage, amid much suppression and media quiet.
An excerpt from the website Moonbattery lays out the penultimate hoax that is Obamacare, about as succinctly as any other known remonstration:
"1. In order to insure the uninsured, we first have to uninsure the insured.
2. Next, we require the newly uninsured to be re-insured.
3. To re-insure the newly uninsured, they are required to pay more to be insured.
4. The extra charges are required so that the original insured, who became uninsured, and then became re-insured, can pay enough extra so that the original uninsured can be insured, which to them will be free of charge."
Obamacare has been proven to be nothing much more than a vast redistribution of both medical care and wealth, aimed parenthetically at eventually controlling the US populace in a way unmatched in American history.
But, now we know this for an admitted certainty--Obamacare is a grand hoax perpetrated on an epic scale, so, why are we still having the conversation on whether or not to repeal?
Isn't it elementary at this point?
"It takes a long time to do the necessary administrative steps that have to be taken to put the legislation together to control the people."
So, what has Dr. Gruber stated thus far which brings us to this point? Let us count the ways....
In the below clip, from 10/17/13, Gruber states the overall impetus of the Obamacare hoax and addresses the "stupidity of American voters."
Next up, from 10/4/13, Gruber explains the Cadillac tax and, once again, the"stupidity" of the American voter as causative.
In this smoking gun clip from a Frontline interview, Gruber both details and implicates Obama with regard to augmentation of the Obamacare hoax, while further cementing Obama's role in US history as being the King of presidentially cynical liars, quite a legacy, that...
Pretty damaging stuff, but of course--as always, it gets better.
After all of this, including Gruber detailing an oval office meeting with Obama, as usual, Obama gets burned and to the third degree. Listen at how Obama tortuously tries to escape from what has become his now custom-designed rat trap, from 11/15/14.
But it wasn't just our pathological Commander-In-Chief--there's more; listen to the below before-and-after of Rep. Nancy "We have to pass it to know what's in it" Pelosi:
In the above clip from 2009, Pelosi praises Jonothan Gruber as brilliant.
However, in the below clip from November 2014, Pelosi pretends complete ignorance of Gruber:
The beautiful thing with regard to all of this is the fact that the evidence is not from some dusty transcript, or quotations from some right-wing news site, but rather these are YouTube clips directly from the very players themselves, who have and will continue their collective efforts to lie their way out of what can in no way now be refuted.
...Of Ghastly Proportion
Indeed, watch Gruber's painfully inadequate effort at recanting what cannot be recanted, you see, Gruber was seen to be very passionate in his repeated efforts showing abject contempt for the stupidity of the American voter--he may be sorry--but it was only because he was caught at being what all elites ultimately are--it's why they think of themselves as elites.
So, Gruber is essentially stating "we have to lie to do this?" Mr. Gruber, didn't your Mother teach you anything, Sir?
Progressives are vainly if not narcissistically superior, but only amongst themselves, and despite a mountain of countermanding evidence to the contrary, for those willing to actually look and see the evidence for what it is.
This is why Obamacare should be repealed, and you already know of all the other reasons.
So, after we've finally learned the basic truths about Obamacare, what was it that the Mainstream Media was saying about uneducated Tea Party radical hicks?
The last laugh is a very sweet thing, Ladies and Gentlemen; however, the thing to remember is that if they've been lying all of this time about this, and they have, then what else have they been lying about and to what end?
It's all quite elementary once one's mind can successfully wrap itself around the overall idea.....
November 9th, 2014
By Barry Secrest
Clearly, the Republicans, much as in the 2010 midterm Tea Party victory, were the election's greatest beneficiaries; however, aside from Obama and the Democrats being the biggest losers, there was one penultimate if not major loser which the media is not talking about--and that's largely because it was the conventional media itself, which was the biggest loser, in 2014.
The mainstream media, since probably 2006, and despite still wielding considerable influence, has quickly become an almost comical shadow of its former self. In fact, the Fifth Estate, that being the new non-conventional media sometimes referred to as the Conservative media, has grabbed an enormous amount of ground since Obama's ascension to power in 2009.
This is largely due to the MSM's seemingly transgenderish transformation from the ever-vaunted Fourth Estate's mission of "Holding Power to Account", to its becoming a Left-Wing cheerleading outfit replete with pom-poms and bubble-gum, cheering Obama's every move as if it were some bizarre replay of Christ walking on the water.
Indeed, "Holding Power in Esteem" was never mentioned by the nation's founders as being an integral cog within the gears of a Constitutional Republic. Yet from a vast array of dictatorial schemes largely ignored by the media, including the media's grandest cheerleading effort of all, that being Obamacare, the American people have come to learn that notions of Liberty to the mainstream media have now been largely relegated to the graveyard of the estranged.
The traditional media has unfortunately become almost completely monopolized under the "Rules for Radicals" movement, so the question becomes, will it ever return to its former glory or will the Fifth Estate move into the otherwise abandoned slot?
Something even more fascinating: All the progressive newspapers and media outlets, fawning over the fall of the Communist Berlin Wall, even while they've continually tried to erect one here in the US under Obama.
Every hardcore Leftist measure known to man has been tried, many succeeding, against a parade of Fascist maneuvers by the Regime including the bugging of the Associated Press building, targeting by IRS of Conservatives, targeting by the regime of journalists, confiscation of weapons, nationalizing healthcare, and on and on......"How stupid do these people actually think we are," or should that be "how stupid are they, actually?"
The ever cosmopolitan New York Times has decided that Obama and the Democrats have a very serious "southern problem."
Yes, indeed, it falls upon all of us uneducated hicks, for the problems which the Progressive party is now facing. However, while the NY Times seeks to render a straw man, a la the Civil War, in order to absorb the blame of outrageous misfortune, no one at the Times can apparently read a very simple graphic.
Wooh-wee! Indeed, based upon the map, it would appear that the Dems have just a wee bit more than a strictly "southern problem."
Granted, all that red truly gets in the way of the facts, however, we southerners--it should be noted--view those little pockets of blue occasionally dotting the landscape as islands of metrosexual imbecility.
I mean, seriously, if it's so great in the north, then why are your people constantly moving into our fine states for jobs? Granted, it's a good deal colder in the north, especially in those rundown cities those northern unions have begotten, but y'all should remember that it's pretty dang hot down here in the heart of the "southern problem," and we love to cling to our guns and religion, albeit not so bitterly--more like lovingly.
From the NY Times:
It remains to be seen whether Democratic weakness in the South will outlive the Obama years. The national Democratic Party has fully embraced and even defined itself in terms of cultural liberalism — on gun control, gay rights, immigration, abortion, environmental policy and other issues. Generational and demographic change are likely to push the Democrats further in this direction, if anything, because younger and minority voters are strongly liberal on cultural issues.
Those voters have helped the Democrats win the popular vote in five of the last six presidential elections. But without a broader base of support that lets Democrats win more votes in the South, it will be very hard for them to win back the House, and it may even be hard for them to win back the Senate.
Lets just hope, as southerners, that the well-heeled powers to the north do not also try to devise a "final solution" for their "southern problem," noting that it wouldn't surprise us much, since history seems to always repeat itself.
The southern problem, I mean seriously? Maybe it's more that we Conservatives have a "northern problem"....
Naw, it can't be that.....
From The Blaze came the following comparison of America before and after Obama......
America's Congress Before Obama in 2008 ....
America's Congress After Obama in 2014.....
So, what does it all mean? Just this.....
We did it.
Confidence in the American tradition of free market capitalism and liberty has just been restored with the results of the 2014 election.
The Conservatives of America came out on November the 4th and participated in a ferocious retaking of a country which had been mired in socialist reconstruction and collectivist authoritarianism for the past six years.
A Red Wave of affirmation on things some thought abandoned.
Granted, it took America long enough, being snared within the affectations of personality worship, rather than simple cause and effect logic, but the realization eventually came through.
With control of both chambers of Congress, against a President who has made it his life's work to deconstruct the very things that made America a powerhouse, the US has been reclaimed by the traditions and individuals which made it great.
The Battle for America is not over, there is much yet to accomplish against a world increasingly stacked against the basic tenets that liberty requires.
However, the game has now been changed in an epic way.
As President Ronald Reagan so aptly stated:
"Let us be sure that those who come after will say of us in our time, that in our time we did everything that could be done. We finished the race; we kept them free; we kept the faith."
Finally, after six long years, we actually kept the faith--a thing many of us thought nigh on to impossible after all the setbacks.
God Bless America.
October 27th, 2014
By Barry Secrest
The Media, the political Left, and Islam itself, have come out repeatedly with assertions that Islam is above all other faiths when it comes to climate change and planetary conservation. But, where do these representations come from?
Rather than relying on simple rhetoric and a few verses in the Quran we decided to take a closer look.
What we found is that the projection by the media concerning Islam as being the "Green Religion" is not at all borne out by the actual facts--especially when we look at the most prominent indicators.
As a matter of fact, it's quite the opposite.....
It began with a story at a prominent Canadian Media publication called CBC News, which recently touted the Muslim religion as being prolific (not in world wide terrorism ) but rather in the area of environmentalism.
CBC News actually stated that "according to a world-renowned scholar, there's another word that should be associated with Islam — environmentalism." "Seyyed Hossein Nasr, a professor of Islamic studies at George Washington University, believes Islam is more disposed toward environmental stewardship than other faiths, and should probably be regarded as the "green" religion."
So, while mass beheadings and the group-burial of infidels does indeed lend itself quite well to the Progressives' goal of population control, also known as sustainablilty, the Islamic faith finds [ itself] well in the forefront of the UN's initiative on climate change, supposedly.
Who could've seen this one coming?
In fact, there are a multitude of websites and publications, which refer to Quranic facets of Islam as being eco-muslim. One site in particular even noted at least ten verses in the Quran as being proof of Islam's conservationist componentry towards environmentalism. So, forget carbon credits, there's a new game in town and its called carbon beheadings.
While some point to the fact that green was apparently "Mohammed's favorite color," others try to draw this tenuous distinction out as being a facet of climate conservation--in essence, green is very important in the Muslim world, because of its kindness to the environment.
Moreover, the supposedly secular BBC actually published an article establishing numerous verses of the Quran as Islam relates to the environment. At Yale University, the climate connection portion of their website speaks of "Green Muslims, Eco-Islam, and evolving climate consciousness."
ABC News Australia published an article titled "Finding the True Green of Islam" in which the green in Islam refers to climate concerns.
One foreign website actually referred to Islam's interest in climate change as an eco-jihad-- so what exactly, is going on here? Has the Islamic world found a new and even more efficient way to ingratiate itself within mainstream climate extremism, and yet another facet in common with Obama?
The entries regarding Islam as it relates favorably towards climate change number well into the millions, and, with some of the most prominent names in the media world.
So, this bit of Islamo-climactic trickery has been going on for some time now, and why not? The ISIS terrorist group maintains that one of its primary goals is to transport the world back the state that it was in at the time of Mohammed and his powerful Caliphate, which was about 588 A.D., give or take a few years, and a good deal of carbon production.
CBC News goes on to allow that Nasr told CBC Radio One's IDEAS, "Christianity in the West has had a tremendous problem: how to come to terms with the environment at a time when its most devout followers have not shown much interest in the environment."( Listen to the full Ideas audio documentary, Islam and the Environment) As he points out, "If you take all the verses of the New Testament, there is no reference to nature."
An 1843 Environmental Extremist? Yes, They were around even before the internal combustion engine.....
Well, then, there you have it, however, it's not just a professorial Islamic apologist, but even in the wider environmental movement which finds Christianity severly lacking when it comes to the planet. According to Marxist-athiest-naturalist (quite a combo) Ludwig Feuerbach's 1843 writings, "many environmentalists view orthodox Christianity as a cultural virus that must be eradicated from the world if the planet is to survive. The "deep ecology" movement in particular insists that, along with the jettisoning of Christianity, true environmental healing can only take place when a new ideology is put in its place."
So, not only do we have political Atheists, Obama, the Democrats, Progressives, and the Islamists, railing against Christianity, now we have even the environmentalists targeting Christians on climate and conservation, due to our tendencies towards Democratic High-Pollutin' Capitalism and free enterprise, no doubt.
With regard to the greening of Islam, Iranian born Nasr states "the Qur'an addresses not only human beings, but also the cosmos. It is much easier to be able to develop an environmental philosophy. Birds are called communities in the Qur'an ... it is so easy to develop an authentic Islamic philosophy of the environment."
But, according to CBC News, Nasr goes on to state " Christianity's sensitivity to the natural world changed in the 1600s, he argues, with the trials of Galileo (for suggesting the Earth revolved around the Sun, rather than the other way around as the Bible had it) For its part, "Islam was never secularized as Christianity was," says Nasr. "Muslims did not lose faith in the same way that happened in the Christian West."
So, is Christianity the pariah of faux-climate change which the political establishment is trying to sell, or might there be another dynamic at work which involves fact rather than an ongoing tide of Islamo-Leftist rhetoric?
It would seem that the answer lies, quite obviously, in the worst offender's list of those countries who're considered the most prolific polluters on the planet, and the prevailing political-religious system involved, within each.
Moreover, based on the premise of Islam as being superior when it comes to environmentalism, are Islamic countries the absolute best when it comes to protecting the planet?
We expect the results may surprise you even more than Professor Nasr, who must have attended the same school on environmentalism, as Obama attended in becoming the ever- vaunted "constitutional expert."
This country ranked as the worst country for air pollution with a PM2.5 level of 101 ug/m3, according to the WHO. The primary form of religion is Islam with a Shariah law based government.
This country ranked as the second worst country for air pollution with a PM2.5 level of 92 ug/m3, according to the WHO. The primary form of religion is Islam with a Shariah law based government.
This country ranked as the 3rd worst country for air pollution with a PM2.5 level of 79 ug/m3, according to the WHO. The primary form of religion is Islam with a Shariah law based government.
This country ranked as the 4th worst country for air pollution with a PM2.5 level of 76 ug/m3, according to the WHO. The primary form of religion is Islam with a Shariah law based government.
This country ranked as the 5th worst country for air pollution with a PM2.5 level of 74 ug/m3, according to the WHO. The primary form of religion is Islam with a Shariah law based government.
This country ranked as the 6th worst country for air pollution with a PM2.5 level of 64 ug/m3, according to the WHO. According to Wiki, the predominant religion in Mongolia is Tibetan Buddhism. Islam is the 2nd most dominant religion, especially among ethnic Kazakhs.
7. United Arab Emirates:
This country ranked as the 7th worst country for air pollution with a PM2.5 level of 61 ug/m3, according to the WHO. The primary form of religion is Islam with a Shariah law based government.
This country ranked as the 8th worst country for air pollution with a PM2.5 level of 59 ug/m3, according to the WHO. According to Wiki, the predominant religion in Mongolia is Hinduism (80.5%) with Islam as the next most dominant religion.
This country ranked as the 9th worst country for air pollution with a PM2.5 level of 57 ug/m3, according to the WHO. The primary form of religion is Islam with a Shariah law based government.
Er.....Houston, we may have a problem......
It would seem that Islam does indeed dominate the world, at least when it comes to the worse ranked polluters on the planet.
So, back to the drawing board for Professor Nasr and shame on CBC News, and most other mainstream media outlets for failing to even go after the simplest notion of research , in publishing articles based on Islamo-climate rhetoric alone.
Neither Christianity, despite ad nauseum slander from the usual suspects, nor any other Western Nations in fact, appear on the radar when it comes to the planet's worst polluters, but Islam certainly does.