August 23rd, 2014
By Barry Secrest
The fateful date of 9/11 is nearing, even while many are beginning to wonder if something may be afoot internally, this year in the US, for what has become a date set in infamy.
Is there a connection between the 2013 border surge with Mexico, which allowed hundreds of thousands of illegals into the US from all over the world, and the ISIS terrorist group threats now suddenly emanating from deep within the US?
The proliferation of ISIS warnings now coming out of the woodwork all over America has been chilling to say the least. It was only about ten days ago that an ISIS member tweeted a pic in front of the White House warning Americans that the brutal Islamic group was here.
In addition, recently an NC man, who is also a supporter of ISIS, was apprehended at Kennedy international airport on weapons charges. Now comes the report of a Twitter pic indicating that ISIS may be targeting one of Chicago's landmark buildings.
The following is a report from WGN:
There is another chilling Chicago connection in the battle between the US. and extreme Islamic militants isil (ISIS).
Now WGN Investigates has found an online war of words and disturbing images that includes an implied threat to a Chicago landmark building.
It’s a nasty, sometimes horrible back and forth coming on the heels of U.S. bombing of ISIS forces in Iraq involving Facebook and Twitter pages with titles like, #AMessageFromISIStoUS and vice versa.
Near the top of this tit for tat is the gruesome video and pictures of journalist James Foley’s beheading.
Some Americans posted on the site disgusting photoshopped images Islamic religious leaders having sex with animals and images of U.S. firepower.
They’re reacting to one of the tweets which shows the ISIS flag in front of the White House.
But scroll down a little farther and you see a picture that might look familiar. Not the writing, which appears to be in Arabic, but the building in the background. That’s on Michigan Ave.
307 N. Michigan Ave to be precise. It’s at the corner of Michigan and South Water Street and it’s called the Old Republic Building.
What we found online was stunning. So we brought it to the attention of the building security team. The apparent message in this photo dated June 20th of this summer, is “soldiers of the Islamic state of Iraq and Syria will pass from here soon.”
Other tweets show the same two pictures saying “we are in your state/ we are in your cities / we are in your streets. You are our goals anywhere.”
More tweets say “we are here #america near our #target :)sooooooooooooon.”
No one in security at the Old Republic Building would comment, nor did the secret service, the FBI, or Chicago police.
So we don’t yet know who posted the picture in Chicago or why they chose that location(End WGN Report).
Bad enough as this seems, we are also now hearing reports of ISIS tactics involving mass attacks on shopping malls all over the US. The question ultimately becomes: Are these rumors real?
An ex-CIA official has already indicated, this week, that there are ISIS sleeper cells in the US.
Yesterday, a report was published in Reuters in which the sitting chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff indicated the following unusually chilling account of the ISIS group:
General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said officials were worried about the possibility that European or U.S. nationals, radicalized after fighting in Iraq or Syria, would return to their home countries.
Dempsey suggested Islamic State would remain a danger until it could no longer count on safe havens in areas of Syria under militant control.
"This is an organization that has an apocalyptic, end-of- days strategic vision and which will eventually have to be defeated," Dempsey said (End excerpt).
By the way, the next Blood Moon for America, out of a total of four in both 2014 and 2015, will occur on October 8th--and they all take place on major Jewish holidays.
August 18th, 2014
By Barry Secrest
As we observe the racially divisive debacle unfolding in and about Ferguson, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis, certain facts are in absence which should be brought to the forefront.
The chaos which is unfolding seems increasingly highlighted by primary witnesses lying and pertinent information being suppressed by none other than the US Department of Justice.
Politically, Missouri is a Red State by all indications, and will most likely continue to be in the forseeable future, and yet some fascinating voter facts are coming to the surface, as riots, looting and general unrest appear to continue unabated.
The most unusual demographic data seems to revolve around the fact that out of 114 Missouri counties, only four actually voted for Obama in 2012, but this is where it gets formidably interesting.
The two of those counties which are filled with a vast majority of Obama-loving voters are the same ones now being placed under a state of emergency by the Missouri Governor for violence and looting.
Indeed, the two counties at the heart of mass anti-government demonstrations, St Louis City and St Louis county, enjoy a combined population of about 1.32 million people.
However, one aspect of note might be the stark difference in racial demographics between the city and the county.
While St Louis county is 2/3rds White, comprising a population total of almost 1 million people, St Louis city holds a strong majority of Blacks, Hispanics and other races, totaling about 320,000 , over 56%, in fact, are considered racial minorities.
Despite these figures, however, well over half of all county dwellers voted for Obama in 2012, while a striking 83% voted for Obama in the city.
So what might this mean?
Regardless of overall racial component, both of the areas suffering riots and other self-defeatingly violent civil society behavior are indeed populated by a majority of "Change We Can Believe In" multi-cultural boasting Obama voters.
So, what's up with that?
|County||Romney||Total Votes||Obama||Total Votes||Other Candidates||O.C. Totals||Overall Totals|
|St. Louis City||16.03%||22,617||82.65%||116,654||1.32%||1,864||141,135|
|St. Louis County||42.53%||223,102||56.18%||294,735||1.29%||6,791||524,628|
However, it gets even better, because there is a powerful dimension missing in all of the rhetoric--that being--what exactly is the ideological political leadership of these two counties?
According to the St Louis County Website, the county is run by a majority of Democrats with 5 out of 7 districts being represented by Democrat Commissioners.
A super-majority of lilly-white Liberal Democrats lead the St Louis County Council
The St Louis City local government Officials boast a total of 28 elected Aldermen and Alderwomen, of that number 27 are card carrying members of the Democrat Party while one is an Independent.
The St. Louise Board of Aldermen comprised of 27 Liberal Democrats and 1 Independent
Ironically, the protesters appear to be protesting conditions brought about by their Democrat inclined choices , a thing which we are repeatedly finding in city after ruined city across America.
While a vast array of newspapers and media outlets have portrayed the city of Ferguson as being predominantly black while under white control, what they fail to mention in virtually every instance, is that the white control is comprised predominantly of those wonderfully erudite Progressive-Liberal Democrats.
In essence, as with the United States as a whole, what we are seeing in and about St. Louis is yet another failure of Progressive Democrat leadership.
August 10th, 2014
It took the US CDC almost five months before it finally issued a travel warning concerning the Ebola virus...why?
By Barry Secrest
As the deadly Ebola virus outbreak now threatens world populations even while the US border is beginning to look more like one of Obama's illusory "Red Lines" than an actual border, the fact that July 2014 has proved to be a rather dire portent of things to come, perhaps need to be examined a bit more closely.
Nor was it lost upon us when we set upon this particular review of our News section, which we periodically undertake, in an effort to make sense of the news items which we've published.
It was March 29th when we initially noticed in world news that something might be terribly wrong on the Dark Continent.
Africa was already reeling from an Ebola outbreak which showed signs, even early on, of being difficult to control.
On March 29th an article was published seeking to warn those who may not be paying needful attention:
The article from RT seemed to be warning that this wasn't one of Africa's typical outbreaks, stating:
"The outbreak of the deadly Ebola virus is said to have already claimed 63 lives in rural Guinea has now spread to the West African nation’s capital, Conakry, with the Health Ministry ringing the alarm and officials calling it a “threat to regional security.”
Needless to say, the only organization in America which seemed to be paying any attention, at this point, was a Christian organization based in Charlotte NC known as SIM USA, whose two now Ebola-stricken missionaries are the same ones being treated at Emory medical center in Atlanta.
So much was our concern that the following day on March 30th, a follow-up article was published titled:
In this article from Reuters World, the message warns anyone willing to listen that something was indeed afoot in West Africa:
"The World Health Organisation said in the statement it does not recommend any travel or trade restrictions be applied to Liberia, Guinea or Sierra Leone based on the current information available about the outbreak.
Ebola has killed more than 1,500 people since it was first recorded in 1976 in what is now Democratic Republic of Congo, but this is the first fatal outbreak in West Africa."
Despite these two widely read warnings from our news site, the message still went seemingly unnoticed by those in power at least at the heart of our nations governing center, and despite the ironic twist of an American leader with deep roots in Africa.
In fact, at about the same time on March 29th another article was published focusing on what appeared to be Obama's chief concern which was dedicated to the actual arming of the very terrorist organization which would take over Iraq in only a few months hence:
The article written by this writer stated the following:
"Barack Obama, in talks with Saudi King Abdullah, is actually considering the arming of Syria's "moderate opposition Islamist rebels" with high-tech shoulder-fired weapons systems. The only problem being that the rebels now in Syria are no longer considered to be moderate by anyone, assuming that they ever were. The opposition rebels are, in fact, almost entirely made up of radical Islamist fundamentalists bent on creating a Syrian-Islamic Caliphate."
So, while Obama was referring to ISIS as a JV team, this website was actually warning anyone who might listen, of the undeniable dangers associated with a radical Islamic force in Iraq.
Despite our practically jumping up and down at this point, there was still little if any news in our government, much less the US mainstream media at large, devoted to the terror building in Africa. Europe's CDC did finally issue a health notice on April, 8th, 2014:
So, another warning was offered up in vainglorious hope that perhaps the various bureau's which seem to be constantly monitoring this site, among many others, might throw us a bone and at least let someone in government know of the persistent warnings.
On June the 20th, the following post was published, not unlike a voice at this point screaming in the wilderness:
With an over-the-top title screaming please pay attention, this site once again warned of a well beyond significant event occurring in West Africa:
"Of greatest concern, in this particular vein, is the fact that the US has now at its head, inarguably, the most irresponsible President in the nation's history--one who seems mostly preoccupied with bringing in disease ravaged refugees from all over the world"....
Ironically enough, at about this same time, a main article was published disclosing the fact that the Obama Regime had, in January, actually posted a notice at a website for federal contractors concerning the procurement of government contractors who would haul over 65,000 illegal immigrant children to points all across the US, and this January posting was done largely in secret, at least at the time:
In our article, gleaned from information which had initially appeared at a website published by Allen West, we described the debacle as follows:
The Post, which advertises an opportunity for independent contractor-drivers for the transport of unaccompanied illegal alien children, had been making the Internet rounds for the past several days.
"The intriguing part of the post is the fact that it was published on January 29, of 2014 and specifically lists a total number of transports at 65,000 . While the border surge of alien-children has been growing over the past several years, how could The Department of Homeland Security possibly know how many children would be coming over the border unless this unprecedented surge had been meticulously planned?"
Perhaps the Regime was still too preoccupied with what it considered to be more pressing concerns in targeting Conservatives for not caring, than to pay attention to the health risks to America associated with one of the most deadly viruses known to man.
At this juncture, figuratively jumping up and down while screaming, on July 2nd, an article was published pointing directly to gross negligence, if not government culpability, on the fact that a government--which was supposed to be protecting us--seemed to be more interested in protecting itself:
In this particular article, the demeanor spoke to one of abject disbelief in the fact that no one within either the US State Department or the CDC seemed to even be mildly aware of the tsunami building in West Africa just across the ocean:
"Despite a both extraordinary and deadly West African Ebola virus outbreak which has infected at least a known 759 and killed over 467 individuals, an increasingly befuddled US State Department has failed to issue any travel warnings for Americans who may be planning visits to West Africa. No one, at least within our government, was seemingly interested in our growing concerns...."
On July 30th, completely exasperated at this point, yet another article was released warning of intercontinental plagues occurring at an unprecedented rate, in effect reaching Biblical proportions, with Ebola leading the way.
It was in the following article that we also outlined the facts concerning a now dead American who had expired right after deboarding a flight in Nigeria, where he flew in two jets for a combined 6 hours across Africa:
Fortunately or not, the Ebola virus was now finally in the limelight, as a result of two SIM missionaries who had contracted the virus being flown back to the US, ultimately if not finally capturing US bureacratic attention, such as it is.
On July 31st, the following article was published:
Here , the Charlotte Observer described the plight of the two missionaries, as a simultaneous debate began on whether or not the missionaries should have been allowed back into the US despite being stricken by the horrible virus.
At this point, on July 31st the US CDC finally issued its initial travel warning for three countries in West Africa:
Also, at about this same time, we received word that DHS had locked down an overwhelmed immigration center due to disease:
On August 2nd, under the auspices of never allowing a crisis to go to waste, an article was published outlining the fact that the American people were being treated to an updated and yet bizarre executive order--in effect--outlining a causation extension of executive order # 13295:
"Obama's just-signed executive order revises and replaces the following section (B), which was initially instituted in 2003 by President George W. Bush:
(b) Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), which is a disease associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, is transmitted from person to person predominantly by the aerosolized or droplet route..."
One day later on August 3rd, The Daily Caller published a Report, which we also released, outlining a Pentagon article detailing the fact that Obama was a serious danger to America....do tell, and in more ways than one, it would seem:
The report pointed how Obama's policies were setting up America for yet another disaster on our own soil, but left out Obama's extraordinary lack of command and control concerning our defense against a deadly virus.
Also on August 3rd, an account was published outlining events which had occurred at Gatwick airport in London, when one of the passengers collapsed and died practically on the tarmac with what could be described as classic Ebola symptoms:
On August 4th, an article was published detailing the possibility of Ebola being in New York City.
The report ultimately came back as Malaria, but not without scaring an entire nation.
On August 5th, after numerous media outlets had previously reported on this for a full five months, the US CDC finally published a stringent travel advisory warning for the West African nations, now under seige-like conditions, due to the frightening disease outbreak:
Would an "It took you long enough" remonstrance be sufficient here?
One day after the CDC posted its warnings, we received word of Ebola practically exploding in the number of both deaths and of those who were now ill:
One day later, on August 7th, the US CDC finally issued a dour warning with the highest alert status:
Also on August 7th, an excerpt from WND was published, indicating that the CDC fully expected Ebola infected victims had flown into the US, however the question remains, what might have happened had they responded more appropriately, meaning much earlier ?
"The head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention told Congress Thursday the current Ebola outbreak is the largest of the disease ever, developing into an international crisis that “has now come to the United States.”
“It is inevitable someone will fly from West Africa to the United States with Ebola symptoms,” CDC Director Thomas Frieden acknowledged in a rare congressional hearing held during the August recess."
It would seem that at this point, the fact of someone flying into the US with one of the most terrifying diseases known to man, might indeed be inevitable--especially since both the Obama Regime, which is obviously more dedicated to fundraising, vacationing, and pointing fingers than anything else, and the CDC , seemingly dedicated to losing vials of trivial little things like anthrax--have pretty much totally and completely ignored the problem from day one and perhaps until it's now much too late.
From on or about August 7th, with an incubation period of approximately 14 to 21 days, the periods from August 21st through August 28th could prove to be well beyond 'interesting' to say the least with regard to possible Ebola infectee's within America.
This assumes that the CDC and transportation officials properly undertake passenger screenings from international traffic, which at this point might prove to be wishful thinking, at best.
Maybe we should've expected this from a government more interested in redistributing wealth & transforming America, than providing national security for actual US threats. Maybe they should let independent bloggers or journalists who actually "do give a damn about America" take over the functions of warning US travelers and citizens.
Or, maybe they will say after the outbreak ultimately occurs and the deaths eventually end:
"What difference, at this point, does it make?"
August 3rd, 2014
By Barry Secrest
We knew the day would come, and it has finally arrived: House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has officially gone from mentally challenged to batsh*t insane.
Granted, it's hard enough trying to understand how a woman worth almost $ 50 million can somehow, at the same time, be a screaming Marxist who accuses virtually every member of her opposition as being either bleating wealth-mongers or greedy capitalists.
Yeah, I know, that's enough hypocrisy to make anyone go cross-eyed in and of itself.
But when we note some of her spastic mutterings over the past six to ten years, many of us have wondered how in the world the woman could have somehow managed to rise to the ranks of House leadership, especially amongst a slew of closeted Left-Wing misogynists.
She obviously boasts some sort of singular talent that most of us have no inkling of...hmm.
Then, her "San Francisco Treat" constituents seem to pedestal the lady as if she's the blasted second coming of Mother Theresa....how in the hell does that happen?
But it's seemingly now gotten much worse, and from the woman who brought us such classically retarded lines as:
"ObamaCare’s Implementation Is Fabulous”
"ObamaCare Is Lowering Costs And The Deficit"
"Unemployment Creates Jobs"
"ObamaCare Will Lower Everyone’s Rates"
"I Don’t Remember Saying ObamaCare Would Lower Everyone’s Premiums"
"Obamacare Allows People to Quit Their Day-Jobs"
"Obamacare is Slashing Deficits"
"Government Fulfills Americans"
"We have to pass Obamacare to know what's in it"
"Obama Has Never Done Anything For Political Reasons"
Pelosi's new congressional lobby hobby apparently includes the act of now chasing Congressmen, who either disagree or challenge her, across the House floor accompanied by fits of screeching and bellicose castigation, while gesticulating wildly.
Gee, wonder if she just unconsciously mistakes the House as also being her home, these days...poor Mr. Pelosi.
You see, a Republican named Tom Marino hit Pelosi with the sledge hammer of truth when he announced the fact that the Democrats, led by Pelosi, had been purposefully ignoring the US border all along, and now that the fecal matter has hit the fan, Obama and the Dems are trying to blame any and everyone, well.... except themselves, but most especially the Republicans...WTF?
I can even hear it now, "Say what?"
This even while the Dem-Progressives have consistently accused the Republicans of being everything from racists to isolationists for trying to put the caput on the swarms of illegals crossing the border.
Wow, so like.... that's new...
However, Pelosi was having nothing of it and flew off like a post-menopausal banshee on steroids, she skittered across the floor tracking Marino to his seat, and certainly not to give him a congressional lap-dance, either.
Apparently, Pelosi was hitting Marino with the one accusation that would have enraged "her" past the point of insanity, aside from the truth already dispensed, of course.
She accused him of being an "insignificant person"