Design Of Darkness: The Globalist Threat To America
April 18th, 2011
By Barry Secrest
The international headline read: "IMF Warns that US lacks credible strategy for dealing with public debt." Doubtless, the article had been written after Obama's predictably inane deficit entrenchment/campaign renewal speech. And yet, we have the Democratic Disciples of Deficit still stubbornly insisting that spending is not the problem but rather it's how little we tax that's at issue, along with how little our Government invests in the economy, which is another way of saying "spend even more money," believe it or not, according to the Democrats.
Meanwhile, and in dire counterpoint, both small businesses and individuals are now gearing up and struggling to access dwindling credit lines and tattered savings accounts, from three prior years of economic dysfunction, in order to tragically fund their Government's spending largess for another year, as the wild beltway spending party intensifies.
While America, once again, collectively scratched its head, trying to figure out what exactly happened in the most recent, if not enigmatic, continuing resolution on spending, many of us were seeing things from a completely different angle. Some were observing how this particular scenario would play out and synchronize with what we have noticed throughout this ongoing season of darkside angst. The point here being that many of us were not even a tittle disappointed in the final budgetary outcome, based upon our historical knowledge of what has gone before with the deceitfully diaphanous Obamaphibians. Why were we not disappointed, one might ask? The beyond-depressing answer can be described as follows :
The Eeyore Paradigm
The attainment of measurable disappointment must be accompanied by at least some semblance of surpassing expectation.
Therefore, the Obama administration has yet to fail us in this particular regard. Now, however, our attention must turret to the current US debt ceiling, in yet another brave congressional foray at piddling away both our children's and their children's legacy. The impending battle for America's mother-of-all credit card limits is looming, as we now stand at surpassing the astounding level of $14.3 trillion in bond debt. If we do not agree to exceed the current level--then America will be unable to borrow any further via the issuing of Treasury bonds and will then, technically, be required to limit spending so that it does not surpass revenue. Now, when you hear the various politicos speaking on this particular subject, you will, in virtually every case, hear a collection of dire predictions and end-of-days scenarios contrived to scared the living hell out of us all, if we fail to raise the limit. So are their any reasonable left-wing voices warning us of why we should not increase the debt limit?
Indeed, there are, and not a moment to soon. These champions of America's past, present and future and avowed guardians of the people's treasure stood and forcefully let forth with these powerful words of wisdom:
The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies. … Leadership means that ‘the buck stops here.’ Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit.
Bravo, Bravo! If only President Obama would listen, alas..... to his own words....yes, indeed. In fact, Obama, in the 2006 quote stated above, actually excoriated the Bush administration for what they were doing to America's financial standing in the world. The debt limit, at that time, being $9.6 trillion and nowhere near as tragically massive as it is at this moment, having risen 50% in an extraordinarily short span of time. But what of any other words from our leaders against raising the debt limit? Were there any others? Oh, yes, and here again, another avowed liberal Democrat. In this instance, it was none other than Harry Reid who said the following:
If my Republican friends think that Increasing our debt by almost $ 800 billion dollars today and almost $ 3 trillion dollars over the last five years is the right thing to do, they should be up front about it. They should explain why they think that more debt is good for our economy. How can the Republican majority in this Congress explain how they think it's fair to force our children,our grandchildren and even our great grand-children to finance this debt through higher taxes~Senator Harry Reid, March 2006
My, my, now isn't that fascinating? So why would raising the debt limit be woefully tragic, even though significantly lesser on the one hand, and yet be a thing that simply must happen at a later date, despite being magnitudinally larger by at least half, on the other? We can all probably answer this particular question as it regards these two individuals, at least in part, based upon who is in meaningfully in power at the time, but what about the other part?
A Shadow Government
That other part belongs to the Shadow Government movement that has blossomed during the Obama administration. As we continue to persevere through our ongoing theme of left-wing capitalism at apex, we can also see that our last words on the subject were reinforced and even spread to a much wider audience.
In The Rise Of Left-Wing Capitalism, we were able to prove Obama's ultimate feelings on capitalism and how, according to him, it has failed. We then went on to illustrate how the radical left wishes to eradicate free-market capitalism and remake America into something else altogether. But the even deeper question that goes to the heart of America's predicament is both the how and the why along with the who. Who has the power, the influence and the ability to help the radical left bring down America, and how have they devised a means to meet that end, and why? (And why, by the way, has the writing of these particular articles, met with all sorts of nearly comical interruptions, strange happenings, and unfortunate interludes of odd goings-on, probably just me...)
Meet Darth Soros
The one particularly powerful anti-individual with a Globalist agenda who wants to see America taken down is global financier George Soros, the left-wing capitalist who brought down the Bank of England, along with a number of other nations in various multifarious ways. When asked why Soros feels that America needs to be taken down, Soros will tell you that his reasons are ones which are global in nature. Soros actually states that:
"The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States."
Soros bemoanedly believes that America "sets the agenda for the world" and the world must respond to that agenda, and that this is beyond bad for the Globalists among our international community, and therefore, all of us, according to Soros.
Interestingly, this viewpoint seems to fit right in with both Obama and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner's views, who have repeatedly stated that America can no longer be the "engine of the world's economies." Secretary Geithner even recently stated that America was "open" to considering the possibility of replacing the dollar as the world reserve currency.
Soros Attacks The US War On Terror
Regarding the saga of George Soros, however, it actually gets far worse. Soros has even stated that the US war on terrorism was a "wrongful decision" because of the "innocent victims." The other side of this argument, which Soros fails to apparently consider, are the millions of innocent victims who suffer as a very real and very direct result of world-wide terrorism. Terrorism, which is primarily perpetrated by radical Islamists, certainly never have any innocent victims, now do they? Soros, dare we leave out, also despised George W. Bush and waged a near-victory in defeating Bush on his second successful term run.
Perhaps Soros, being far more cunning even than he seems, doesn't actually feel sorry for these innocent victims of the US attack on terrorism and, one then presupposes, the un-innocent victims of Islamic terrorism. Rather, Soros deftly twists the range of human emotion back in on itself in order to motivate his army of emotionally contrived "useful idiots" who then wreak havoc within the media. But, beyond the obvious funding of Soros' impressive wealth to mainstream left-wing groups, many have wondered exactly how Soros manages to impassion so many followers?
The answer to that question is beyond simple enough. Soros has funded hundreds of these left-wing organizations and websites, reaching into the $ 100's of millions, in order to further a political backing that delightedly rages against both Conservatives and right-of-center media organizations. Fox News has most recently been the focus of his targeting, which ultimately resulted in Soros' main media nemesis, Glenn Beck, being eliminated from his position. Glenn Beck had been instrumental, at Fox, in teaching America the exquisite details behind Soros--along with his goals. In fact, Beck once met with one or more of Soros' henchmen so that they could relay the fact that they were very unhappy with him. No wonder Beck's hair turned white seemingly in a span of months....has anyone else noticed that particular fact?
Soros Admits To Messianic Fantasies
Regardless, the other side of Soros' darkside appeal, most likely, flows from the force of his power throughout the world, but also from Soros' seemingly genteel second nature. Soros, in many circles, is thought of as a left-wing Guru who considers himself to be a philosopher and Elitist world class philanthropist. Soros is, in fact, an atheist who has even had problems with feelings of self-described potent Messianic fantasies, which have gotten him into trouble from time to time. Indeed, we are not surprised, would be our response.
An atheist with Messianic tendencies? How might that happen? Enter Soros' childhood, where as a young boy George Schwartz was adopted by one of Hitler's henchmen, and during what Soros has described as "one of the happiest and most fulfilling times of my life," assisted the Nazi's in seizing the property of Jews in Hungary, most of whom were put to death in Hitler's concentration camps.
In fact Soros takes great glee and satisfaction from his work at bringing darkness to other nations and finds that it fuels his insane notion that he might be the Messiah, and an evil one at that. When asked about his role in various financial crisis' this is what he stated:
The World Financial crisis was stimulating and , in a way, a culmination of my life's work
Now, that's just spooky, but if we pause for a moment and allow all of the pieces to flow and interact with one another, we can begin to see a certain pattern settling into focus. We can also begin to see the problems with Soros' particular range of thinking, along with a whole other agenda as perpetrated by Obama and the Democrats, which insidiously moves America into the path of financial ruin. We have also seen how the Saul Alinsky trained, Obama, has ratcheted up US spending to unprecedented levels, while Washington appears under near-total control by the free-spending Democrats, many of whom are also under Soros' control in a movement born under the auspices of global redistribution.
The Connection Of Two, Master and Apprentice
So, as we begin to weave the threads of complicity together, we now look at the connection between one man who wants to bring down the United States in Soros, and the other who actually now leads the United States, in Barack Hussein Obama.
- The first official association for Soros and Obama came in 2004, when Soros hosted a fundraiser in Obama's successful 2004 Senate Campaign.
- Later, during Obama's Senatorial run, and due to the millionaires rule involving candidates running against millionaires, Soros was able to fund Obama's Senate campaign to the tune of over $60,000 not including funds tapped from Soros' 527 non-profit organizations, such as Moveon.org.
- Later, according to most published accounts, the two officially first met in 2006 at Soros' New York office, when Obama began exploring the possibilities of a Presidential run.
- On January 16, 2007, Obama announced a presidential exploratory committee where Soros immediately donated the campaign maximum of $2,100.
- Also in 2007, Soros reportedly dropped his support of Hillary Clinton for President.
- Only a few days after Obama's November 2008 election, Soros indicated in an interview: "I think we need a large US stimulus package which will provide funds for state and local governments to maintain their budgets." Soros also indicated, "For such a program to be successful, the Federal Government would need to provide hundreds of billions of dollars."
- Soros has, since the beginnings of the Obama Administration, visited the White House on five separate occasions.
George Soros White House Visits
One undated visit by Soros (date unknown)
* To avoid public knowledge, Obama began holding meetings near the White House for lobbyists and other controversial visits, circumventing documented White House visit requirements.
The connections between the anti-American Soros and Un-President Obama being undeniable, what does this then all mean? Well, we should look to at least one other major point that few if any have brought up. In 1992, George Soros made his first billion by successfully shorting or hedging the British Pound with leveraged billions in financial bets. He became known, from this particular exploit, as being the man who broke the British pound. Kyle-Anne Shiver, in American Thinker, wrote:
"He broke it(the British Pound) on the backs of hard-working British citizens who immediately saw their homes devalued and their life-savings cut drastically short, almost overnight."
Now, does this remind you of anything that occurred here in the US, say...in late 2008, on the eve of Obama's presidential election? Wasn't that just a smashing bit of luck for Obama, to have one of the worst financial disasters in American history to occur within a few weeks of his election and under the presidential tutelage of the opposing party he was trying to defeat? Are there, indeed, any coincidences? Did Soros and the Globalists have anything to do with the trillions that were lost by the US Treasury?
As a Globalist, Soros believes in his dark mentor, Economist Karl Popper's teachings of Fallibalism and the open society. Open Society believes in a test and evaluate methodology of social engineering (read Socialism), while Fallibilism believes that "all claims of knowledge could essentially be wrong," which means, in essence, a belief in metaphysical nothingness. This belief in fallibilism, to many, might back up Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohammad's assertion, who called Soros "a villain and a moron." In contrast, Thai activist Wen Tojirakarn states that the Thai view Soros as "a kind of Dracula," and remember, this is one of Obama's chief contributors.
Few across the world of nations, from the Russian satellite countries to many Asian countries, to even Greece have little if anything good to say of George Soros. In retrospect, when we look at Obama's other professional associations and friendships and then factor in the media's lack of reporting during the presidential campaign and divide by Soros' menacing mega-media silhouette, everything becomes startlingly clear.
The Globalist's main goal is to have one centralized powerful governing body over one world. Make no mistake, all religious parallels aside, the Globalist's desire is to engineer and control both trade and humanity the world over.
There is one major factor that stands in the way of that goal.
In order to retain the authority and the power of a one-world globalist society, there can be only one major power. The United States economically, militarily and ideologically stands fully in the way of the globalists' centralized, inhumane goal. What better way to take Her down softly, while whispering sweet hope and change in Her ear than the way in which we are seeing at present.
The Dreaded Obamasoros
While America teeters on the brink of an insolvency that at least one of Obama's chief benefactors, George Soros, states he both wants and desires , and then when we factor in Obama's statements and feelings on Capitalism and how it doesn't work--along with his socialist proclivities on redistribution and big Government--it becomes quite plain to see that America is under some very dark and imminently powerful influences.
Interestingly, as an ominous, coincidental chord to this column, one of the largest financial rating Companies in the world published a revision concerning the United States and its public debt. Standard and Poors, on the eve of this column being published, changed the US AAA bond rating outlook to 'Negative' based upon the President and Government's refusal to meaningfully deal with the US public debt problem. Obama's response, being cognizant that both he and Soros' insidious game of ruining the US free-market economy might be in peril, stated the following:
Standard and Poor's negative outlook underestimates the country's ability to face financial challenges'
Indeed, it is not the country's ability that is being questioned Mr. Obama, it is your goals that are being questioned. The one thing that the congressional Republicans, the few remaining actual Democrats, and the American people should remember is that with these infernal aims and nefarious associations, and with all of the wasted upheaval that America has seen over these last few years, America should be doing the exact opposite of essentially everything that Her President wants and desires.
But only if our Constitutional Republic, in its current form, is to survive and prosper.
Yesterday, I held a fiscal summit in which I promised to cut the US deficit in half by the end of my first term in office~President Barack Obama, 2/24/09 joint session of Congress
Still waiting Mr. President...