Conservative Refocus

By Barry Secrest

Barack Hussein Obama...MMMMM....MMmmm....mmmm!

When you listen carefully to our "Stealth-Authoritarian-in-Chief,"  he never fails to amaze, even while his antics seem to continually evade his cheer-leading troupe in the mainstream media.  But when it comes to The Blame Game, the President magnificently ekes out a position that's consistently "lame."

When the President actually undertakes to alienate an entire church, such as with the recent debacle with the Catholic Church,  we can begin to see that Obama just can't seem to move away from his radical anti-Constitutional stance. Obama is actually requiring, in this latest case, via force of Government, the Church to completely ignore what is a basic foundation of the Church's policy with regard to birth control and pro-creation.

However, the Church's former stance, in complete support of Obamacare and Obama himself, lends this latest abuse a certain undeniable sweetness, to we Conservatives, who have been warning any and all who might listen about the excesses soon to be found in the colostomy bag of Obama's detritus.

In that vein, and in his most recent interview, Obama,  rather than reaching back a diminutive four years  to accuse former blaming-back, President Bush, this time decided to travel back in time over 230 years to essentially nail the Founding Fathers, themselves, for their short-sightedness.

In what should be the quote of the year, Obama begins by laying a flawed foundation of excuses by stating this:

"What's frustrated people, is that I haven't been able to force Congress, to implement every aspect of what I said of 2008"

Oh, really?  Well, it would appear that the President's words speak to certain truths that he might rather be left unstated, when we peer very closely at those words. First of all, the people of the United States have no desire to have their grand potentate "forcing" Congress to do anything.  It's always been, at least over these prior two centuries,  the President's job to lead Congress, not force them. But force, as far as Obama's domestic policy goes, has always been the alternate of primary choice with regard to the Obama White House, when simple decrees just don't seem to get the job done.

As the quote concluded, I was hoping to see the part where Matt Lauer falls to his knees and begins spit-shining the President's shoes with his silvery tongue; for another time, perhaps.

But then, the second point here would be that the President had two very long years of a completely at-his-will Congress made up of socially Liberal Democrats. And these Democrats, by the way,  were operative at placing virtually every big-brother, big-government policy known to man into action, at least in the  amount of time allotted.  Perhaps if Obama had played less golf and gone on less vacations, he could have accomplished every bit of his agenda, which is why you rarely saw this one complain.

But, lo and behold, our Constitutional Republic has an automatic answer, built in, for those Leaders who think they have express carte blanche. That answer, being the remedy of all ills, specifically allows for the people, in this case, to let their President know exactly how they feel about his leadership. Obama's Congress, as a result, was voted out of power in 2010, thus pre-empting the President's ability to boldy usurp our Liberties any further, at least via congressional means.

However, Obama narcissistically ignored the People's will, even here.  You see, what's truly frustrated We the People is not Obama's inability to pass his entire Saul Alinksy agenda, but rather the struggle to figure out a way to actually stop him from doing it, and it has worked, at least in part.

But, then, Obama adds the cherry on top in his revealing interview,  by stating this:

"Well, you know, it turns out that...Uh...our Founders designed a system that makes it more difficult to bring about change, that I would like sometimes"

Indeed, they did Mr. Obama, and being a Constitutional expert and attorney, you also know the reasons as to the "why" the Founders made it so difficult to arbitrarily change things, even as Chief Executive. We do, indeed, understand your not "liking" being limited in the amount of mass chaos you are capable of producing.

However, this "why," Mr. President, was the Founders' exact solution, just in case, in their undying, if not prophetic wisdom; someone came along, who is exactly like "You."

Neat how that works, huh?