Conservative Refocus

By Barry Secrest

The initial story from Reuters didn't really make any sense when the article reported that non-Muslims were fleeing Islamic attackers in India, while placing the blame for the fleeing on the ones who were actually fleeing.

So, why wouldn't the Muslims be the ones fleeing, if indeed they were the ones being attacked, was the obvious question before me.

The headline read:

India: Text message threats, rumors came from Pakistan

Not satisfied with the broken logic, I peered to the story box over to the side in the Reuters panel. The line-up of stories had other news on the event,  so maybe I could understand what was happening a little better if I read further. I clicked on the article that had originated several days earlier.

The headline read as follows:

Thousands flee south Indian city after communal violence

The story, once again, spoke to Muslims being alarmed over the attacks that were occurring; however, once again, those who were fleeing appeared to be non-Muslims. Not only that, the story spoke to over 80 'people' being killed; however, the article failed to state who was being killed in these clashes (I bet I know).  But apparently, Muslims around the world were severely outraged at the attacks.

Well, since when have the purveyors of Islam not been outraged about something or the other, I thought? They kill women, Christians and homosexuals almost as casually as one might squish an insect underfoot, while feigning outrage at their desperate need to perpetrate murder in the first place.

Still mystified, I looked over into the side-panel, once again, hoping that this bread crumb trail of elusive facts would somehow come together and make sense. The next article, seemingly the nexus of the series, ran the following headline:

Fleeing violence, India's displaced face disease, death in camps

Would this article finally be the one that might provide the keystone for this elusive story?

I clicked on the article. The captioned picture showed an elderly, white-bearded Indian man who was quite obviously in distress. He did not appear to be Islamic, although I have no idea exactly how I could somehow tell the one from the other. Perhaps it has something to do with the terror displayed on the subject's face, something with which we are intimately familiar  following 9/11.

But, would this article provide some of the facts that had been missing?

Deeper Meanings

The story began as a news piece seeking to explain why over 400,000 Indians were huddled in camps, while suffering all sorts of diseases and maladies in the ensuing squalor. But here, also, the article began to explain what had been missing.

A clash had initially occurred between Bodo tribespeople and "Muslim settlers" from Bangladesh, which had resulted in the deaths of four Bodo youths. The story went on to indicate that the men who killed the Bodo youth were 'unidentified'; however, if the clashes began between Bodo tribespeople and Muslims,  it shouldn't be very hard to understand exactly who these unidentified men were. They were quite obviously our 'violated Muslim victims.'

Right.

But here, again, wasn't it these Muslim settlers who had fomented the initial attacks, anyway?

The story went on to detail how the Bodo had retaliated against the Muslim invaders and killed several of them for their initial acts of aggression in killing the Bodo youth to start with. However, when we retrace our steps all the way back to the initial story, the details become somewhat more meaningful as the reprefaced meanings take on a truer shape.

The initial story spoke to text messages, which had originated in Islamic Pakistan and had then been cleverly distributed extensively throughout southern India, apparently engineered to cause thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of non-Muslims to flee from the southern areas of India, ostensibly leaving the way clear for the Islamists to move in.

But here, again, the actual story tangled up in all of this required a considerable amount of  'piecing the puzzle together' in order to arrive at what is truly happening in India, and even why.

It's called Islamic Civilization Jihad, and it appears to be the answer to our hanging question of "why," while also appearing to be the root of this new terror causing people to flee from their homes in India. A terror which, not coincidentally, is now happening to one of the few remaining actual democracies in that particular part of the world.

So What Is Civilization Jihad?

Civilization Jihad can be defined as any of  several Muslim methods designed for the  eventual Islamization of a country or nation or  non-Islamic society.  These methods include political penetration, settlement and even the legal incursions of Islamic law or Shariah, into a given legal system by any means necessary, including the insertion of political operatives at high levels of government.

Now, after having understood the missing ingredient of this entire story, as it applies to India, one can begin to also understand how it is that a major media news organization would report a story so severely slanted that it would seek to represent the attackers as the victims and the victims as the attackers.

It is, in fact, happening to the mainstream media as well, with a few editorial strokes of the proverbial pen.

This methodology of Civilization Jihad has obviously been very effective as practiced on the Mainstream Media of the world, since 9/11. Many Conservatives, as well as numerous others across the political spectrum, have been increasingly mystified over the last decade at how the Mainstream Media has serially defended the acts of the militant Islamic extremists, rather than highlighting their acts of extreme violence out into the public eye,  for all to see.

When we see the traditional religions of Protestantism and Catholicism being vilified by the media for some imagined chicanery, while the religion of Islam has been largely portrayed as a victim among western societies, despite all evidence to the contrary, many Americans and Euopeans seem to struggle at coming up with a valid explanation for this, and rightfully so.

And yet the answer to this seeming quandary has been leering at us the entire time and is actually quite simple.

The Islamic Civilization Jihadists have successfully penetrated these Mainstream Media organizations to the point that the actual news and the propangandized versions no longer bear any meaningful resemblance to one another.

Civilization Jihad has, in fact, gained a foothold in the world media organizations and is gaining more influence with every day that passes.

Reuters might want to consider doing a bit of organizational soul-searching, along with not a few other media organizations, regarding how they may have been compromised by this insidious Islamist methodology, while it's not too late.  However, this particular instance of  trying to understand a given story from the mainstream media is but one of many personal efforts, repeated many times over the last several years, especially where islamic extremism is concerned,

By the way, we already have an Islamic press; it's called Al Jazeera, and not coincidentially, it's the Obama Regime's favorite news outlet.

Go figure.